🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over Formation and Philosophy

For example, it was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Supreme Authority Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Football Order: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not creating the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or fails of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss him for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later discard him for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.